Publique un comentario 
Sindesmosis tibioperonea: diagnóstico, métodos de fijación y artroscopia
Resumen
Introducción: las lesiones de la sindesmosis tibioperonea son frecuentes tanto de forma aislada o asociadas a fracturas del maléolo posterior. El diagnóstico clínico es corroborado mediante estudios imagenológicos. Los métodos de fijación pueden ser rígidos o dinámicos.
Objetivo: actualizar aspectos sobre las lesiones de la sindesmosis tibioperonea en cuanto al diagnóstico, métodos de fijación y el empleo de la vía artroscópica.
Método: la búsqueda y análisis de la información se realizó en un periodo de 61 días (1 de octubre al 30 de noviembre de 2022) y se emplearon las siguientes palabras: syndesmosis injury, ankle syndesmosis instability, syndesmosis instability AND tight rope ankle instability, posterior maleolar fracture. A partir de la información obtenida se realizó una revisión bibliográfica de un total de 258 artículos publicados en las bases de datos PubMed, Hinari, SciELO y Medline mediante el gestor de búsqueda y
administrador de referencias EndNote.
Desarrollo: se hizo referencia a las maniobras clínicas para el diagnóstico y las clasificaciones tomográficas en caso de fractura asociada del maléolo posterior. Se mencionaron los métodos de fijación rígidos y dinámicos, donde se describieron las características de cada uno basado en varios factores. Se expusieron las ventajas de la vía artroscópica tanto para el diagnóstico como para el tratamiento.
Conclusiones: las lesiones de la sindesmosis tibioperonea distal son frecuentes. Los estudios tomográficos ofrecen ventajas al determinar la extensión de la fractura del maléolo posterior. La vía artroscópica ofrece múltiples ventajas diagnósticas y terapéuticas.
Palabras clave
Referencias
Corte-Real N, Caetano J. Ankle and syndesmosis instability: consensus and controversies. EFORT Open Rev [Internet]. 2021 Jun [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 6(6):420-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.210017
Hagemeijer NC, Elghazy MA, Waryasz G, Guss D, DiGiovanni CW, Kerkhoffs GM. Arthroscopic coronal plane syndesmotic instability has been over-diagnosed. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 29:310-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06067-5
Xie W, Lu H, Quan Y, Liu Y, Fu Z, Zhang D, et al. Morphological analysis of posterior malleolar fractures with intra-articular impacted fragment in computed tomography scans. J Orthop Traumatol [Internet]. 2021 [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 22(1):52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-021-00615-6
Baltes TPA, Al-Sayrafi O, Arnáiz J, Al-Naimi MR, Geertsema C, Geertsema L, et al. Acute clinical evaluation for syndesmosis injury has high diagnostic value. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2022 Nov [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 30(11):3871-3880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs00167-022-06989-2
Chen KH, Chen CH, Huang YM, Lee HH, Tsuang YH. Injury mechanism affects the stability of suture-button syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2020 Dec [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 15(1):599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02141-3
Egol KA, Koval KJ, Zuckerman J. Handbook of fractures. 6ed. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer; 2020.
Chun DI, Cho JH, Min TH, Park SY, Kim KH, Kim JH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of radiologic methods for ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2019 Jul [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 8(7):968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070968
Sharif B, Welck M, Saifuddin A. MRI of the distal tibiofibular joint. Skeletal Radiol [Internet]. 2020 Jan [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 49(1):1-17. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03260-7
Teramoto A, Shoji H, Anzai K, Kamiya T, Watanabe K, Yamashita T. Tibiofibular space widening assessment with a ball-tipped probe in a syndesmosis injury model. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2020 Nov-Dec [Citado 20 Nov 2022]; 59(6):1215-1218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2020.03.024
Hookway S, Lambers A, Page R, Bedi H. The Australian ankle syndesmosis injury survey. Injury [Internet]. 2022 Jun [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 53(6):2304-2310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.024
Cornu O, Manon J, Tribak K, Putineanu D. Traumatic injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2021 Feb [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 107(1S). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102778
Rudloff MI. Fractures of the lower extremities. En: Azar FM, Beaty JH. Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. 14ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2022. p.2812-2838.
Bejarano-Pineda L, Guss D, Waryasz G, DiGiovanni CW, Kwon JY. The syndesmosis, Part I: anatomy, injury mechanism, classification, and diagnosis. Orthop Clin North Am [Internet]. 2021 Oct [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 52(4):403-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2021.05.010
Çaglar C, Akçaalan S, Akkaya M. Anatomically fixed posterior malleolar fractures in syndesmosis injuries without transsyndesmotic screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2022 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 43(4):486-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007211060067
Sin YH, Lui TH. Arthroscopically assisted reduction of sagittal-plane disruption of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Arthrosc Tech [Internet]. 2019 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 8(5):E521-E525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2019.01.014
Pogliacomi F, Filippo M de, Casalini D, Longhi A, Tacci F, Perotta R, et al. Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: from diagnosis to treatment and current concepts. World J Orthop [Internet]. 2021 May [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 12(5):270-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i5.270
Spennacchio P, Seil R, Gathen M, Cucchi D. Diagnosing instability of ligamentous syndesmotic injuries: A biomechanical perspective. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) [Internet]. 2021 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 84:105312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105312
Tourné Y, Molinier F, Andrieu M, Porta J, Barbier G. Diagnosis and treatment of tibiofibular syndesmosis lesions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res [Internet]. 2019 Dec [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 105(8S):S275-S286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.09.014
Yu GS, Lin YB, Xiong GS, Xu HB, Liu YY. Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review. Int Orthop [Internet]. 2019 Nov [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 43(11):2539-2547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04396-w
White T, Bugler K. Ankle fractures. En: Tornetta P, Ricci WM, Ostrum RF, McQueen MM, McKee MD. Court Brown CM. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. 9ed. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer; 2020.
Williams C, Momenzadeh K, Michalski M, Kwon JY, Nazarian A, Miller CP. Anatomic and radiographic safe zone for posterior malleolar screw placement. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2021 Dec [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 42(12):1598-1605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007211022747
Grambart ST, Prusa RD, Ternent KM. Revision of the chronic syndesmotic injury. Clin Podiatr Med Surg [Internet]. 2020 Jul [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 37(3):577-592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2020.03.011
Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H. Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am [Internet]. 2006 May [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 88(5):1085-1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.e.00856
Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kostlivy, Vanĕček V, Klika D, Trešl I. Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Internet]. 2015 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 135(4):505-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4
Carr JB, Gebhard F. Malleolar fractures and soft tissue injuries of the ankle. En: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Krettek C, Anderson PA. Skeletal Trauma. 5ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015. p.2189-2249.
Baumbach SF, Böcker W, Polzer H. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolus fractures. Oper Orthop Traumatol [Internet]. 2021 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 33(2):112-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00064-021-00705-y
Tomar L, Govil G, Dhawan P. Isolated posterior malleolar fracture: a case report of a rare presentation with narrative review of literature. Cureus [Internet]. 2022 Jan [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 14(1):e21658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21658
Fernández-Rojas E, Herrera-Pérez M, Vilá-Rico J. Posterior malleolar fractures: Indications and surgical approaches. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol [Internet]. 2022 Nov [citado 20 Nov 2022]:160-169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2022.10.019
Elghazy MA, Hagemeijer NC, Guss D, El-Hawary A, Johnson AH, El-Mowafi H, et al. Screw versus suture button in treatment of syndesmosis instability: comparison using weightbearing CT scan. Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2021 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 27(3):285-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2021.01.001
Balso C del, Hamam AW, Chohan MBY, Tieszer C, Lawendy AR, Sanders DW. Anatomic repair vs closed reduction of the syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2021 Jul [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 42(7):877-885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100721990008
Kurtoglu A, Kochai A, Inanmaz ME, Sukur E, Keskin D, Türker M, et al. A comparison of double single suture-button fixation, suture-button fixation, and screw fixation for ankle syndesmosis injury: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) [Internet]. 2021 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 100(13):e25328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000025328
Bafna KR, Jordan R, Yatsonsky D, Dick S, Liu J, Ebraheim NA. Revision of syndesmosis screw fixation. Foot Ankle Spec [Internet]. 2020 Apr [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 13(2):138-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640019843328
Huang CT, Huang PJ, Lu CC, Shih CL, Cheng YM, Chen SJ. Syndesmosis changes before and after syndesmotic screw removal: a retrospective radiographic study. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. 2022 Mar [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 58(3):445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58030445
Mercan N, Yildirim A, Dere Y. Biomechanical analysis of tibiofibular syndesmosis injury fixation methods: a finite element analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2022 May [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 62(1):P107-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2022.05.007
Gan K, Xu D, Hu K, Wu W, Shen Y. Dynamic fixation is superior in terms of clinical outcomes to static fixation in managing distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2020 Jan [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 28(1):270-280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05659-0
Lehtola R, Leskelä HV, Flinkkilä T, Pakarinen H, Niinimäki J, Savola O, et al. Suture button versus syndesmosis screw fixation in pronation-external rotation ankle fractures: a minimum 6-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Injury [Internet]. 2021 Oct [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 52(10):P3143-3149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.06.025
Marasco D, Russo J, Izzo A, Vallefuoco S, Coppola F, Patel S, et al. Static versus dynamic fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc [Internet]. 2021 Nov [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 29(11):3534-3542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06721-6
Yüce A, Misir A, Yerli M, Bayraktar TO, Tekin AÇ, Dedeoglu SS, et al. The effect of syndesmotic screw level on postoperative syndesmosis malreduction. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2022 May-Jun [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 61(3):P482-485. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.09.022
Kaiser PB, Bejarano-Pineda L, Kwon JY, DiGiovanni CW, Guss D. The syndesmosis, Part II: surgical treatment strategies. Orthop Clin North Am [Internet]. 2021 Oct [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 52(4):417-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2021.05.011
Xu K, Zhang J, Zhang P, Liang Y, Hu JL, Wang X, et al. Comparison of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw in the treatment of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2021 May-Jun [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 60(3):P555-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2020.08.005
Xu Y, Kang R, Li M, Li Z, Ma T, Ren C, et al. The clinical efficacy of suture-button fixation and trans-syndesmotic screw fixation in the treatment of ankle fracture combined with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a retrospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2022 Jan-Feb [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 61(1):143-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.07.009
Taki M, Suzuki K, Yoshimizu T, Hio N, Hasegawa A. Arthroscopic handlebar technique for the treatment of posterior malleolar fractures. J Orthop Sci [Internet]. 2022 Nov [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 27(6):1342-1344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2022.07.014
Cândido Nishikawa DR, Honda Saito G, Oliveira Junior AS de, Moreira Mendes AA, Piovesana Devito L, Pires Prado M. Clinical outcomes of isolated acute instability of the syndesmosis treated with arthroscopy and percutaneous suture-button fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Internet]. 2021 Sep [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 141(9):1567-1574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03813-3
Shamrock AG, Khazi ZM, Carender CN, Amendola A, Glass N, Duchman KR. Utilization of arthroscopy during ankle fracture fixation among early career surgeons: an evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II oral examination database. Iowa Orthop J [Internet]. 2022 Jun [citado 20 Nov 2022]; 42(1):103-108. DOI: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35821943/
Copyright (c) 2023 Alejandro Alvarez-López, Valentina Valdebenito-Aceitón, Sergio Ricardo Soto-Carrasco
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.