Perceived quality of life and adherence to treatment in patients with end-stage chronic renal disease
Keywords:
adherences to treatment, perceived quality of life, chronic renal disease, hemodialysisAbstract
Introduction: the end-stage chronic renal disease, due to how it affects the patient´s quality of life and the difficulties involved in the adherence of patient to treatment, is one of the most complex health problems.
Objective: to identify the relationship between perceived quality of life and adherence to treatment in patients with end-stage chronic renal disease receiving hemodialysis.
Method: a correlative study was conducted in the hemodialysis service room at the Hospital General Docente “Juan B. Viñas González” in Palma Soriano, Santiago de Cuba. The universe studied included 32 patients and 16 (met inclusion/exclusion criteria) were selected to work with. The techniques used were: World Health Organization quality of life questionnaire, document review, interviews and observation. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed (frequency analysis) and the nonparametric method applied was the Spearman's correlation coefficient using the SPSS 19.0 data processing program.
Results: More than half of the population (56.25%) reported a fair quality of life, good (25%), and bad (18.75%). The physical health dimension was one of the most affected and it was found a negative assess of the disease in which more than 85% of those polled considered it as serious or very serious. Some sleep disorders was found and more than 60 % of patients were unsatisfied related this issue. Most of the patients (81.25%) characterized the disease symptoms as severe or very severe.
Conclusions: patients studied had an adherence to treatment in a medium level and a perceived fair quality of life. There is also a correlation between the patient adherences to treatment and perceived quality of life.
Downloads
References
2. Roca R. Temas de Medicina Interna. 5ed. La Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Médicas; 2017.
3. Brito JC, Gutierrez CG, Cruz CA, Pérez FR, Mazon OL, Delfino WG. Calidad de Vida en adultos mayores con enfermedad renal crónica en el nivel primario de salud. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2018 [citado 16 Nov 2019]; 40(1):48-56. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-18242018000100006
4. Costa GM, Pinheiro MB, Medeiros SM, Costa RR, Cossi MS. Calidad de vida en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica en hemodiálisis. Enferm Global [Internet]. 2016 [citado 23 Nov 2020]; 15(43):59-73. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1695-61412016000300003&lng=es&tlng=es
5. WHO. WHOQOL: Measuring Quality of Life. www.who.int World Health Organization; 2020 [citado 9 Jun 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/tools/whoqol/whoqol-100/docs/default-source/publishing-policies/whoqol/spanish-spain-whoqol-100
6. Leyva Y. Calidad de vida, alteraciones emocionales y afrontamiento en pacientes con Insuficiencia Renal Crónica Terminal [Tesis Licenciatura en Psicología]. Santiago de Cuba: Universidad de Oriente; 2007.
7. Ortega CJJ, Sánchez HD, Rodríguez MOA, Ortega LJM. Adherencia terapéutica: un problema de atención médica. Acta Méd Grupo Ángeles [Internet]. 2018 [citado 1 Feb 2021]; 16(3):226-232. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/actmed/am-2018/am183h.pdf
8. Vargas M, Herrera C, Rocha L. Aportes para el abordaje interdisciplinar de la adherencia al tratamiento. Acta Med Colomb [Internet]. 2018 [citado 1 Feb 2021]; 43(1):37-41. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/amc/v43n1/0120-2448-amc-43-01-00037.pdf
9. Cepeda C, Warner C, Barrales C, Núñez N. Locus de control y adherencia al tratamiento en personas con insuficiencia renal crónica. Cienc Psicol [Internet]. 2007 [citado 6 Mar 2020]; 1(1):1-7. Disponible en: https://es.scribd.com/document/226886796/Locus-de-Control-y-Adherencia-Al-Tratamiento-en-Personas-Con-Insuficiencia-Renal-Cronica
10.Sánchez CR, Rivadeneyra-Espinoza, L, & Aristil PM. Calidad de vida en pacientes bajo hemodiálisis en un hospital público de Puebla, México. AMC [Internet]. 2016 [citado 12 Ene 2019]; 20(3):262-270. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-02552016000300006&lng=es&tlng=es
11.Pretto CR, Winkelmann ER, Hildebrandt LM, Barbosa DA, Colet CF, Stumm EMF. Quality of life of chronic kidney patients on hemodialysis and related factors. Rev LatinoAm Enferm [Internet]. 2020 [citado 14 Mar 2020]; 28:e3327. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.3641.3327
12.Suárez L, Gross R. (2019). Estimulación cognitiva y apoyo familiar hacia adulto mayor con deterioro cognitivo. Rev Inf Cient [Internet]. 2019 [citado 26 Ago 2019]; 98(1):88-97. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1028-99332019000100088
13.Sánchez E, García O, Segura M, Álvarez A. Percepción de redes de apoyo del paciente con enfermedad renal crónica en terapia sustitutiva con diálisis peritoneal. Med Gen Fam [Internet]. 2020 [citado 30 Nov 2020]; 9(4):173-177. Disponible en: http://mgyf.org/percepcion-de-redes-de-apoyo-del-paciente-con-enfermedad-renal-cronica-en-terapia-sustitutiva-con-dialisis-peritoneal/
14.Amigo I. Manual de psicología de la salud. 2ed. Madrid: Ediciones Pirámide; 2015.
15.Forero J, Hurtado Y, Barrios S. Factores que influyen en la adherencia al tratamiento del paciente en diálisis peritoneal. Enferm Nefr [Internet]. 2017 [citado 12 Ene 2019]; 20(2):139-148. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/enefro/v20n2/2255-3517-enefro-20-02-00149.pdf
